EN: Expected return and variance of a portfolio, the role of correlation, and Roy's safety-first criterion.
VN: Lợi suất kỳ vọng và phương sai danh mục, vai trò của tương quan, và tiêu chí Roy.
60% in equities (E(R) = 10%), 40% in bonds (E(R) = 4%). What is the expected portfolio return?
Diversification: Lower \(\rho\) → lower portfolio variance. With \(\rho = 1\) no diversification benefit; with \(\rho = -1\) full hedge possible.
w₁ = 0.5, σ₁ = 20%; w₂ = 0.5, σ₂ = 10%; ρ = 0.3. Compute portfolio standard deviation.
Note: \(\text{Cov}(R_i, R_i) = \sigma_i^{2}\), so the diagonal contributes the variance terms.
3 equal-weight assets, σ each 20%, all pairwise correlations 0.4. Compute portfolio σ.
ρXY = −0.3, σX = 12%, σY = 18%. Compute Cov(X, Y).
EN: Choose the portfolio with the highest SFR — analogous to Sharpe but uses a "minimum acceptable return" threshold instead of \(R_f\).
VN: Chọn danh mục có SFR cao nhất — giống Sharpe nhưng so với mức tối thiểu chấp nhận được.
Portfolio A: E(R) = 10%, σ = 12%. Portfolio B: E(R) = 8%, σ = 7%. Threshold R_L = 3%. Which is safer by Roy's criterion?
EN: If returns are normally distributed, the probability of falling below \(R_L\) is \(N(-SFR)\).
VN: Nếu lợi suất phân phối chuẩn, xác suất rơi dưới \(R_L\) bằng \(N(-SFR)\).
SFR = 1.65. What is the shortfall probability assuming normal returns?